The World Wide Web was
an enormous step for mankind, a step not seen
since Neil Armstrong sullied the surface of the
moon. The idea behind the WWW came across as a
veritable information highway where documents,
data and info could be rapidly sent and
accessed by millions the world over. The
potential behind the web is enormous and even
now the scope is not fully utilized. The
possibilities for growth, for extended usage,
are available and enormous yet the system is
stagnating and it is very possible that people
will soon turn away. The average person seeking
information may well return to old-fashioned
libraries and the good old book to find the
information that they require if the face and
image of the WWW is not altered very soon and
in-line with customer demand.
The ability of any user
to gain information from the Internet is
enormous, simple and with positive results. But
the information received is increasingly
becoming that which a paying body prescribes
and thus is advertisement biased or pointed
towards the end purchase of a product. Hotels
advertise a city or holiday resort with the
point of view of potential tourists coming to
stay. A detailed description of moon cakes in
Taiwan although complete and detailed would
certainly be with aim to make people buy some
from the store hosting the website
involved.
Initially the Internet
was heralded as a one-stop point for gaining
any type or form of information with the click
of the mouse. This is certainly true except
with regard to loose information that has no
affiliation towards an end purchase or a users
change of heart. Certainly this type of
information is available and millions of
websites exist but unless a user has prior
information on how to access this site then the
chance of it being found amongst the masses is
minimal. Most web users find or locate
information by using a search engine. Most web
users input their request and wait for results
to come up as prescribed and ordered by the
search engine system. If for example a request
was entered for “travel tales on the sea” many,
possibly thousands of choices will appear in
return. Number one in the pole position will
probably be Amazon.com who feels certain that
anybody looking for a story would probably find
it amongst their collection – naturally
obtainable at a price. The next on the list
might be Ebay who feel that certain travel
products might appease the searcher or it might
be goarticles.com an articles selling service
who would assume that travel tales of the sea
would be somebody looking to buy such from them
and for their own use.
Certainly each and
every result that is produced on the first page
would point the user towards large companies
who are selling an item of one sort or another.
The user though may in fact just want to read
some Travel Tales of the Sea without having to
fork out cash or to issue his/her credit card
information over the Internet.
In the bowels of the
search results in pages that are covered in
dust will reside some very comprehensive and
useful websites, eg: http://www.seadolby.com
a website that is filled with free and
in-depth Travel Tales of the Sea. The
possibility of any user keeping interest
long enough to get to this web site listing
is minimal and long before it is reached the
user has either fallen asleep or entered
another search on a different note. In short
the average user does not get past the first
page of a search engines results and
probably not past the first three that come
up: e.g. amazon.com, ebay.com and
goarticles.com
Although not-for-profit
informational web sites are many and filled
with amazing and detailed info these sites
ability to gain attention on the world stage is
difficult unless money is poured in to boost
their ratings and rank positions on the search
engine results. Nowadays many search engines
have entered the pay-per-click arena with
companies putting forward money to buy keywords
that will most likely be used to boost their
website. Some company buys the word “Travel”
and this word is then basically lost forever to
the lone free-for-all info site who cannot
afford to pay money to boost their
popularity.
The art of advertising
and paying for positions on search engines is
only available to the sites that can afford the
exorbitant fees. Should a lone site owner who
has built his site-up decide to fork out of his
own pocket the money to boost his ratings this
will only be achieved on one or two search
engines or directories and the amount required
to compete with the mega-sites is far beyond
any hobbyist can afford. Naturally the ability
to submit ones site on free inclusion pages and
directories is available but as the webmaster
and author behind Seamania found out, so much
energy and time is spent on advancing the
ratings of his site that not enough time is
given to the writing of travel tales of the
sea, which of course is the basis and sole
point behind the website in the first
place.
Large for profit
websites can afford to hire web-orientated
staff to control, advertise and spend time on
boosting the rankings of their particular
website. Single owner for profit websites can
afford to pay marketing specialists and to buy
keywords at exorbitant rates. The lone
not-for-profit website owner can either spend
all day and all week controlling and submitting
his site to the thousands of ever changing
search engines and directories and suffer from
a serious loss of updated content on his/her
website or place emphasis on building up
content and never have a visitor to his
portal.
Many other factors go
towards reducing the effectiveness of the
individual website than just search result
rankings. Many single website owners operate
outdated and very slow computers, use old or
outdated software and only perform on odd
occasions when not playing with their children
or busy at work. Many other free info sites
have found that subscribing to some lists to
boost their rankings has in-fact reduced them
to near invisibility. Google and now other
search engines condemn sites for using link
pages that they themselves do not agree with,
so by simply subscribing or joining one of
these sites Google may drop a future crawl of
the website involved. It is also impossible for
the lone not-for-profit website to keep up with
ever changing trends and policies. Where
payment is made for a lifetimes inclusion in a
search engine, the next year may see the demise
of this particular engine or its partnering up
with another – thus the lifetimes inclusion
becomes null and void and to prevent being
dropped from the listings another fee is
required – read the small print!
Other means to increase
visibility is often initiated by offering
advertising space to companies like Google,
Barnes and Noble or other directories or
affiliates. This can result in a slight income
for websites (The Seamania website made 40US
dollars over the last three months) but never
enough to afford placement on search engine
results or to purchase keywords. It is also
against the grain for many free-info website
owners to have to place advertising on their
websites as not only is it taking up valuable
space it detracts and reduces the free effect
the content within. Furthermore should a
website choose one companies advertising it may
boost their rankings within one search engine
but equally so reduce it in another’s e.g.
allowing Google advertising space on an index
page may increase the page rank in Google but
seriously reduce it in Yahoos search results
and possible exclusion from their Yahoo
Directory.
>From the point of
view of an Internet User in search of free and
not-for-profit biased information he/she does
not want to see endless sites where a visa card
is required to proceed further. It would be
very nice to see the advancement of such
directories like Zeal.com who divide their
listings into those for profit and those who
generally provide valuable and non-profit
orientated formation. Naturally the question
arises as to how such a search engine would
manage to cover the costs of these listings but
generally with the amount of people available
who regard the Internet as a toy and a hobby
projects such as Editor of a category
volunteers should not be hard to recruit. The
other way would be to have search engines run
and operated by governments like public
libraries are or built and operated by
universities as part of study programs –
something practical for students to involve
themselves with.
Directories abound
whose content is managed by volunteers, the
Open Directory Project being the most famous.
But sites such as Seamania have found to their
detriment that trying to get noticed in amongst
the debris found in these directories is not
easy. Seamania was originally listed as a
Personal website in the boating category but
over time the emphasis and content of the
website has evolved to become a general travel
website. It has though proved impossible to
change the location of the site in the Dmoz
directory to a travel listing rather than a
boating listing.
If at all possible and
to prevent users who are sick of being asked
for their credit card information or being
given 30 different porn sites upon entering
Travel Tales of the Sea into a search engine,
it would be nice to see a shift in emphasis in
the way that the search engines operate their
listings.
Certainly the idea of
switching on a computer and being faced with
two choices, one for sites that are-for-profit
and one that points towards not-for-profit
sites would be a dream come true. To enter in a
search request and to not find amazon.com or
ebay.com in the first few results would put
cheer to any searchers hopes of finding what he
wants. And maybe in this way a true exchange of
information may be facilitated and the mass
exodus of searchers back to the public library
for information may be halted.
About The
Author
Ieuan Dolby - Author
and Webmaster of Seamania. As a Chief Engineer
in the Merchant Navy he has sailed the world
for fifteen years. Now living in Taiwan he
writes about cultures across the globe and life
as he sees it.
seadolby.com
ieuandolby@seadolby.com
|