The World Wide
Web was an enormous step for mankind, a step
not seen since Neil Armstrong sullied the
surface of the moon. The idea behind the WWW
came across as a veritable information
highway where documents, data and info could
be rapidly sent and accessed by millions the
world over. The potential behind the web is
enormous and even now the scope is not fully
utilized. The possibilities for growth, for
extended usage, are available and enormous
yet the system is stagnating and it is very
possible that people will soon turn away. The
average person seeking information may well
return to old-fashioned libraries and the
good old book to find the information that
they require if the face and image of the WWW
is not altered very soon and in-line with
customer demand.
The ability of any user to gain information from
the Internet is enormous, simple and with positive
results. But the information received is
increasingly becoming that which a paying body
prescribes and thus is advertisement biased or
pointed towards the end purchase of a product.
Hotels advertise a city or holiday resort with the
point of view of potential tourists coming to stay.
A detailed description of moon cakes in Taiwan
although complete and detailed would certainly be
with aim to make people buy some from the store
hosting the website involved.
Initially the Internet was heralded as a one-stop
point for gaining any type or form of information
with the click of the mouse. This is certainly true
except with regard to loose information that has no
affiliation towards an end purchase or a users
change of heart. Certainly this type of information
is available and millions of websites exist but
unless a user has prior information on how to
access this site then the chance of it being found
amongst the masses is minimal. Most web users find
or locate information by using a search engine.
Most web users input their request and wait for
results to come up as prescribed and ordered by the
search engine system. If for example a request was
entered for “travel tales on the sea” many,
possibly thousands of choices will appear in
return. Number one in the pole position will
probably be Amazon.com who feels certain that
anybody looking for a story would probably find it
amongst their collection – naturally obtainable at
a price. The next on the list might be Ebay who
feel that certain travel products might appease the
searcher or it might be goarticles.com an articles
selling service who would assume that travel tales
of the sea would be somebody looking to buy such
from them and for their own use.
Certainly each and every result that is produced on
the first page would point the user towards large
companies who are selling an item of one sort or
another. The user though may in fact just want to
read some Travel Tales of the Sea without having to
fork out cash or to issue his/her credit card
information over the Internet.
In the bowels of the search results in pages that
are covered in dust will reside some very
comprehensive and useful websites, eg:
http://www.seadolby.com a website that is filled
with free and in-depth Travel Tales of the Sea. The
possibility of any user keeping interest long
enough to get to this web site listing is minimal
and long before it is reached the user has either
fallen asleep or entered another search on a
different note. In short the average user does not
get past the first page of a search engines results
and probably not past the first three that come up:
e.g. amazon.com, ebay.com and goarticles.com
Although not-for-profit informational web sites are
many and filled with amazing and detailed info
these sites ability to gain attention on the world
stage is difficult unless money is poured in to
boost their ratings and rank positions on the
search engine results. Nowadays many search engines
have entered the pay-per-click arena with companies
putting forward money to buy keywords that will
most likely be used to boost their website. Some
company buys the word “Travel” and this word is
then basically lost forever to the lone
free-for-all info site who cannot afford to pay
money to boost their popularity.
The art of advertising and paying for positions on
search engines is only available to the sites that
can afford the exorbitant fees. Should a lone site
owner who has built his site-up decide to fork out
of his own pocket the money to boost his ratings
this will only be achieved on one or two search
engines or directories and the amount required to
compete with the mega-sites is far beyond any
hobbyist can afford. Naturally the ability to
submit ones site on free inclusion pages and
directories is available but as the webmaster and
author behind Seamania found out, so much energy
and time is spent on advancing the ratings of his
site that not enough time is given to the writing
of travel tales of the sea, which of course is the
basis and sole point behind the website in the
first place.
Large for profit websites can afford to hire
web-orientated staff to control, advertise and
spend time on boosting the rankings of their
particular website. Single owner for profit
websites can afford to pay marketing specialists
and to buy keywords at exorbitant rates. The lone
not-for-profit website owner can either spend all
day and all week controlling and submitting his
site to the thousands of ever changing search
engines and directories and suffer from a serious
loss of updated content on his/her website or place
emphasis on building up content and never have a
visitor to his portal.
Many other factors go towards reducing the
effectiveness of the individual website than just
search result rankings. Many single website owners
operate outdated and very slow computers, use old
or outdated software and only perform on odd
occasions when not playing with their children or
busy at work. Many other free info sites have found
that subscribing to some lists to boost their
rankings has in-fact reduced them to near
invisibility. Google and now other search engines
condemn sites for using link pages that they
themselves do not agree with, so by simply
subscribing or joining one of these sites Google
may drop a future crawl of the website involved. It
is also impossible for the lone not-for-profit
website to keep up with ever changing trends and
policies. Where payment is made for a lifetimes
inclusion in a search engine, the next year may see
the demise of this particular engine or its
partnering up with another – thus the lifetimes
inclusion becomes null and void and to prevent
being dropped from the listings another fee is
required – read the small print!
Other means to increase visibility is often
initiated by offering advertising space to
companies like Google, Barnes and Noble or other
directories or affiliates. This can result in a
slight income for websites (The Seamania website
made 40US dollars over the last three months) but
never enough to afford placement on search engine
results or to purchase keywords. It is also against
the grain for many free-info website owners to have
to place advertising on their websites as not only
is it taking up valuable space it detracts and
reduces the free effect the content within.
Furthermore should a website choose one companies
advertising it may boost their rankings within one
search engine but equally so reduce it in another’s
e.g. allowing Google advertising space on an index
page may increase the page rank in Google but
seriously reduce it in Yahoos search results and
possible exclusion from their Yahoo Directory.
From the point of view of an Internet User in
search of free and not-for-profit biased
information he/she does not want to see endless
sites where a visa card is required to proceed
further. It would be very nice to see the
advancement of such directories like Zeal.com who
divide their listings into those for profit and
those who generally provide valuable and non-profit
orientated formation. Naturally the question arises
as to how such a search engine would manage to
cover the costs of these listings but generally
with the amount of people available who regard the
Internet as a toy and a hobby projects such as
Editor of a category volunteers should not be hard
to recruit. The other way would be to have search
engines run and operated by governments like public
libraries are or built and operated by universities
as part of study programs – something practical for
students to involve themselves with.
Directories abound whose content is managed by
volunteers, the Open Directory Project being the
most famous. But sites such as Seamania have found
to their detriment that trying to get noticed in
amongst the debris found in these directories is
not easy. Seamania was originally listed as a
Personal website in the boating category but over
time the emphasis and content of the website has
evolved to become a general travel website. It has
though proved impossible to change the location of
the site in the Dmoz directory to a travel listing
rather than a boating listing.
If at all possible and to prevent users who are
sick of being asked for their credit card
information or being given 30 different porn sites
upon entering Travel Tales of the Sea into a search
engine, it would be nice to see a shift in emphasis
in the way that the search engines operate their
listings.
Certainly the idea of switching on a computer and
being faced with two choices, one for sites that
are-for-profit and one that points towards
not-for-profit sites would be a dream come true. To
enter in a search request and to not find
amazon.com or ebay.com in the first few results
would put cheer to any searchers hopes of finding
what he wants. And maybe in this way a true
exchange of information may be facilitated and the
mass exodus of searchers back to the public library
for information may be halted.
About the author:
Author and Webmaster of Seamania.
As a Chief Engineer in the Merchant Navy he
has sailed the world for fifteen years. Now
living in Taiwan he writes about cultures
across the globe and life as he sees
it.